Page 2 - ISQ UK_October 2017
P. 2

INVESTMENT STRATEGY QUARTERLY





























           Trade Wars: Should You Pick a Side?




           Chris Bailey, European Strategist, Raymond James Euro Equities*, looks at the options facing investors
           as the trade war between the U.S. and China heats up.






           "Just remember, once you're over the hill you begin to pick   WEIGHING UP THE OPTIONS
           up speed"  Arthur Schopenhauer                       It does not take much analysis to conclude that trying to avoid all
                                                                impact is not really an option at all. Concerns about the impact on
           For a number of months now, the world’s largest survey of   risk assets from a trade war may push an investor into more fixed
                                                                income or cash biased investments. However, all investment
           fund  managers has  observed that, when asked for their   choices have a trade-off and the current low yielding nature of
           greatest financial market fear, the most cited response has   such  investments  does  not  provide  much  compensation,
           been a ‘trade war’. There is a significant slug of rationality   especially at a time of global inflation bubbling up and a global
                                                                shift  from  quantitative  easing  to  quantitative  tightening,  which
           for this.                                            could independently prove troublesome for such assets.
                                                                Additionally, the reliance of many countries on significant non-
           GLOBAL GROWTH RISK?                                  domestic flows to support their budget deficit and national debt
           The World  Bank has  noted that over  the 2017-19  period  the   funding  operations  opens  up  the  potential  for  surprising  trade
           predicted proportional contribution to global real gross domestic   war impacts, even beyond the trickle-down impact of more
           product stands at 35.2% from China and 17.9% from the United   uncertain  future  economic  growth  rates.  Similar  unanticipated
           States. Unsurprisingly, rhetorical flourishes that have spilled over   tactical  impacts  can  easily
           into heightened, new tariffs, between two countries that currently   afflict alternative investments,   The reliance of many
           directly account for over 50% of global growth at-the-margin (and a   property and even gold   countries on significant non-
           likely even higher proportion indirectly), have induced concern. So,   (admittedly  of  all  the  above   domestic flows to support their
           has the time come for investors to pick a side? When looking to   assets have seen this and far   budget deficit and national
           invest outside of the UK, or even into London-listed companies that   more  and  still  persisted  but   debt funding operations opens
           trade  heavily  with  either  nation  -  should  investors  be  picking  a   can  still  be  subject  to  more   up the potential for surprising
           favourite, ignoring the tension or avoiding all impact as much as   tactical   bouts   of   trade war impacts
           possible?                                            underperformance).


           2   *An affiliate of Raymond James & Associates, Inc., and Raymond James Financial Services, Inc.
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7